In other words, they have to deserve their own page because of their position, their achievements, their utterances, and so forth. The subject you are writing about should be "notable". Take time to get sources and policy right and your content will last.State facts and statistics don't be vague or general.Write without bias, as if you neither like nor dislike the subject.Subjects require significant coverage in independent reliable sources.The plain and simple Wikipedia rules are summarized below : There are strict rules on what is and what is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Rules On What Sort Of Pages Are Acceptable There are some simple guidelines to using Wikipedia content elsewhere. However, when editing Wikipedia, please only add content which you have created, or which you have been permitted to use under the terms of the licenses mentioned above. Wikipedia articles can be copied and modified by anyone, but there's a catch: All modifications have to be made available under the same conditions, and credit has to be given to the original authors. What is copyleft? According to the Wikipedia page : That obviously creates a conflict - Wikipedia calls it copyleft. However, Wikipedia's content are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). CopyleftĮverything is copyrighted by default, even if it does not say that explicitly. Copies may also be sold commercially, but, if produced in larger quantities (greater than 100), the original document or source code must be made available to the work's recipient. giving readers the rights to copy, redistribute, and modify a work and requires all copies and derivatives to be available under the same license. According to its Wikipedia page (where else?!), the license means : Who Owns Wikipedia Content?Īll text on Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA), and in most cases, also the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Luckily there are well-tested mechanisms in place to quickly deal with it, along with some very useful anti-vandalism tools. Give everyone editing privileges on one of the largest sites on the Internet and you are inviting trouble. However, collaboration can be a double-edged sword. When you have a collaborative project like Wikipedia, the advantages can be numerous. Some Wikipedia Controversies To Be Aware Of You will find all of these languages on the left of the article page. In other words, you may get a lot more information on the subject studying a foreign version of a page. And all of those contributors will have written the article differently, with varying viewpoints. Just as the English Wikipedia has contributors donating their time and knowledge, so has all the other Wikipedia sites. Why is it useful to study the foreign language version of the page you're reading? Well, think of it this way. These come from that language's own Wikipedia site. One feature which you may not be aware of, is where a page has an equivalent page in a different language. There are a list of rules you must follow at all times. Go to the official Spoken Wikipedia page before starting. So you lose some part of the hyperlinked "Wikipedia Experience".īut as this list shows you, there are many advantages to using Spoken Wikipedia. Plus, it goes without saying that you can't follow links in an audio version. Some sites consider this amusing, and Wikipedia actually has a page on the most vandalised pages. But not if someone disputes the change and begin arguing about it. It is a good thing if an error is spotted and fixed immediately.is a Twitter bot that tweets anonymous edits made to Wikipedia from IP addresses in the US Congress. Quite a few politicians have been caught doing this. quite often makes an anonymous account, to remove anything unfavourable rewrite parts to make them look good make their qualifications look better, and so forth. A person who has a page - a politician, a celebrity, etc.Anyone, especially people who are not eligible for a Wikipedia page, make one anyway, in the hopes it won't be noticed.Especially if a Wikipedia editor decides it has to go, and the contributor feels slighted. It is easy to start fights over new articles.It may be some time before it is noticed. If a lot of information gets added in a short space of time, it is easy to slip in misinformation and slander.And the disadvantages of using crowd-sourced content for a site?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |